Laneville Marker is associated with May 1775 and the history of Dunmore. This property stood within the Revolutionary-era landscape of VA - King and Queen. Its residents, farms, roads, or local institutions contributed to the home front, although no specific major battle or documented military headquarters at the site is firmly established. A mile and a half southwest stood Laneville, built by Richard Corbin, receiver general (treasurer) about 1760 on the site of an earlier house. There Patrick Henry sent, May 1775, to obtain money in payment for the colony's powder seized by Lord Dunmore. Laneville was one of the largest and finest houses in Virginia.

Because this entry concerns a marker, the visible object is primarily a guide to an earlier event rather than the event's original fabric. Markers select facts, names, and dates for public memory, often compressing uncertainty and change into a small amount of text. The most useful way to visit is to compare the inscription with the surrounding geography and the fuller account in this record. Doing so restores movement, distance, and setting to a story that the marker alone can only summarize.

A house or homesite places public history within a private and domestic setting. Such properties could support farming, business, hospitality, political discussion, military lodging, or family networks, even when no formal institution operated there. Their historical value often comes from the people who lived or stayed on the land and from the decisions, labor, and relationships centered there. The setting therefore links biography and household life to events unfolding beyond the property boundaries.

Within the broader theme of Dunmore, this place shows how national history was assembled from local actions. Strategy and policy depended on geography, labor, supplies, communication, and cooperation that varied from community to community. The event recorded here is therefore significant on two levels: for what happened at or near this location, and for the way that episode contributed to a wider sequence of military, political, economic, or social change. The marker makes that connection visible in the present landscape.

The importance of the site lies in this combination of event, place, and memory. Although the present surroundings may differ sharply from those known by the people in the account, the location preserves a spatial connection that written history alone cannot provide. Careful stewardship should retain the marker, document changes to its setting, and distinguish verified facts from later tradition. In that form, the site can support a fuller understanding of the people involved and of the networks that connected this episode to wider events.